Holograph and the implicate

So I've been reading a lot the last few days, in particular this one book entitled the Holographic universe. I know, heavy stuff..... Basically, and I mean it, basically, it's an alternative theory to/incorporating quantum mechanics- dealing in principle with the nature of reality.

The theory explains the interconnectedness of all things, and provides a creadible explination of paranomrmal occurences. Everything we see and experience is simply a holograph of sorts, the interaction of frequencies and patterns which are converted -just like a computer converts binary code/or numbers- into meaning.

The theory extends into everything from quantum mechanics into the nonlocation of memories stored in the animal brain.

The elusive unified field theory which Einstein once sought is rationalized and justified in this cutting edge scientific/philosophical adventure. I found the book extremely insightful at the start but towards the end falls short of my high expectaions. Otherwise I would have been intrigued, but the descriptions of miracles and the author's psychic/telekinetic abilites made me less then reasured. Personally I have not witnessed any "miracles", and it must be stated that my own reality is limited to things which I have observed or witnessed.

There were many parts however which resonated with me 01100101 *computer code- including the incorporation of Jung's collective unconscious and the undeniable fact of synchronicity- the occurrence of two events which are random but too close to be described by chance.

Overall, there were moments when my whole understanding of the universe felt like it had become unhinged and I was deeply moved by the contentions of the proponents of Holographic implicate and explicit orders of reality. BAH- just read the book.

It is well worth a read if you want a ride away from your absolute certainties and belief systems. It's good sometimes to keep these things in check.

Regards to Angular Impulse and Momentum

So I'm currently studying for a mechanical engineering dynamics exam and it isn't what I would call fun. The whole theory makes no sense to me and makes me question my choice in majors. There are times that I revel at the beauty of physics, but other times my stomach gets upset and my head starts spinning. I think my violent rejection is caused by the incompatibility of logic and meaningless symbols with my current schema/ box of handy dandy mental equations.
So far I have grappled with relative velocities and have handled many of newtons laws to some successful degree, however, the rotational kinematics of rigid systems is begin to take its toll on my patience.

Do you think I should give up, or apply my Maurice Richard derived "principia" of tenacity...? je ne sais pas!

Going Astral

Dizzyflame (that is me) might start collaborating a new blogger (self-published)
however, this opportunity will give me more inspiration to ramp up this site as well as gaining new ideas for fresh material for your reading pleasure-
Dizzyflame is about to go informatic (electronic) and awesome all at the same time.

Im into girls- music- money- power- fashion- cars- pop culture, and pretty much everything that you like. Ive seen alot of things, and been with alot of people= so this next chapter in dizzyflame land shouldn't surprise you?

Id like to offer a simple to follow manuel to advanced subjects in mechanical engineering.. before you say wow, I can't even count to eleven without my toes, let me tell you that I am not math oriented at all, but am extremely right brained and creative/artistic type. So having stuggled to have releseased many blocked synaptic passages in my prefrontal cortex so that I could succeed in school gives me a perspective which will help anyone who might be struggling as well or who just needs some interesting mathematical stimulus to complement their afternoon crumpets and tea.

Leave me comments feedback and concerns and Ill be gald to respond immediately! woot